<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Validity in Research Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.activecampaign.com/blog/validity-in-research-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.activecampaign.com/blog/validity-in-research-design/</link>
	<description>ActiveCampaign - Development, PHP, Programming &#38; More...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:13:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ashu</title>
		<link>http://www.activecampaign.com/blog/validity-in-research-design/comment-page-1/#comment-72433</link>
		<dc:creator>ashu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.activecampaign.com/blog/2009/01/02/validity-in-research-design/#comment-72433</guid>
		<description>I am not clear on the use of construct validity in your context. How can one proove that the data for research conforms to reality?
How can do in order to establish construct validity and to provide evidence that your data supports the theoretical structure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not clear on the use of construct validity in your context. How can one proove that the data for research conforms to reality?<br />
How can do in order to establish construct validity and to provide evidence that your data supports the theoretical structure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Is a Web Survey? &#124; ActiveCampaign, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.activecampaign.com/blog/validity-in-research-design/comment-page-1/#comment-68158</link>
		<dc:creator>What Is a Web Survey? &#124; ActiveCampaign, Inc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.activecampaign.com/blog/2009/01/02/validity-in-research-design/#comment-68158</guid>
		<description>[...] a question or fails to comprehend the question the way it was intended then the data is neither valid nor reliable.  A question must use language in a way that makes the intended observer’s meaning [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a question or fails to comprehend the question the way it was intended then the data is neither valid nor reliable.  A question must use language in a way that makes the intended observer’s meaning [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interpreting Questions &#124; ActiveCampaign, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.activecampaign.com/blog/validity-in-research-design/comment-page-1/#comment-67696</link>
		<dc:creator>Interpreting Questions &#124; ActiveCampaign, Inc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.activecampaign.com/blog/2009/01/02/validity-in-research-design/#comment-67696</guid>
		<description>[...] survey you need to ask yourself whether questions measure what you intend them to measure.  Is it valid?   Do your respondents interpret your questions the same way.  Is it reliable?  In order to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] survey you need to ask yourself whether questions measure what you intend them to measure.  Is it valid?   Do your respondents interpret your questions the same way.  Is it reliable?  In order to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
